I've heard two approaches to adding schema names for tables in the reactor config files. The first is to add an "owner" which would look like:
<object name="mytable" owner="tigger" />
The second is to allow fully qualified table names which would look like:
<object name="tigger.mytable" />
I tend towards a variation of the first were the schema name can be complicated as needed:
<object name="mytable" schema="tigger.eyore.bear" />
What are your thoughts? Total indifference, one of these or something new?
Thanks, Beth
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
reactor@doughughes.net
Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
- [Reactor for CF] adding schema names Beth Bowden
- Re: [Reactor for CF] adding schema names Tom Chiverton
- RE: [Reactor for CF] adding schema names Van Daele Wouter \(DBB\)
- Re: [Reactor for CF] adding schema names Dan Wilson
- RE: [Reactor for CF] adding schema names Doug Hughes
- Re: [Reactor for CF] adding schema names Tom Chiverton
- Re: [Reactor for CF] adding schema names Patrick McElhaney
- RE: [Reactor for CF] adding schema names Doug Hughes
- Re: [Reactor for CF] adding schema names Matt Williams
- Re: [Reactor for CF] adding schema names Brian Kotek
- Re: [Reactor for CF] adding schema names Beth Bowden