Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:02:39PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote: > >>>>> "Hans" == Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > Hans> I think that requiring a confirmation response by non-subscribers > Hans> is acceptable, given the serious nuisance spam has become in the > Hans> last 2 years. > > As long as it remembers who's already confirmed. e.g. I read the list > through the gmane mail-news gateway, and don't want to have to confirm > every time I post a message. If I only need to confirm once, that's > fine.
good idea, i think it could be done fast enough. i'll try it.. > > -- > Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/ > PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA > Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA > Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. -- "the liberation loophole will make it clear.." lex lyamin
