Hans Reiser wrote:
I think that most of our problem is that we are too socially insulated from lkml. They are a herd, and decide things based on what thoughts echo most loudly.
To be fair, it's not the whole lkml you have to convince, just the few people directly responsible for filesystems and 2.6 maintenance. But then, they probably do consider what the herd is saying...
It might even be socially effective to shut down reiserfs-list until inclusion occurs.
Maybe. It will be an inconvenience for me, if we have to. I'm not even on LKML, and I'd rather not be -- even this list can get noisy at times...
But I will go with it if it's what works best.
