On Friday, April 26, 2013 08:44:35 Rex Dieter wrote: > With my packager-hat on, this raises some concern about future possible > version assumptions being broken (ie, packaging that assumes constant > versioning across all kde core packages). That's something that will > have to be dealt with sooner or later (with frameworks5) anyway, so > maybe it's not necessarily a bad thing.
Yeah, something we have to figure out. My thinking (and I'm undecided on which way to go there): - If we only increase version numbers for the things that actually get feature updates, we might create confusion as to what fits together - If we keep all numbers consistent (basically our current release policy -- all get the same number), people might misunderstand, distros might not dare upgrading to, for example 4.12 because they want to ship long-term-maintained code. Input, especially from distros is most welcome to fledge this out futher. Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
