On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 06:05:48 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 10:01:47 PM Luca Beltrame wrote: > > Il Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:18:01 -0700, Eric Hameleers ha scritto: > > > No, of course not. I consider the git branch to be in eternal flux. The > > > git HEAD may contain valuable usability patches but also other meh stuff > > > > > > > > Thanks to technical (CI, automated testing) and social (widespread code > > review) measures, this assumption IMO does no longer hold true for the > > vast majority of cases. > > How does CI or automated testing prevent commits of marginal value in a > stable branch (i.e. "meh stuff")?
Any examples for "meh" stuff? To answer your question, it doesn't (and I think that is pretty obvious), so I wonder why you're asking? -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org _______________________________________________ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team