I took a closer look at the New York statutes, and hereâs what I found:  

 

Domestic Relations Law sec. 12 provides that âNo particular form or ceremony is 
required when a marriage is solemnized as herein provided by a clergyman or 
magistrate, but the parties must solemnly declare in the presence of a clergyman or 
magistrate and the attending witness or witnesses that they take each other as husband 
and wife.  In every case, at least one witness beside the clergyman or magistrate must 
be present at the ceremony.â

 

Domestic Relations Law sec. 17 provides that âIf any clergyman or other person 
authorized by the laws of this state to perform marriage ceremonies shall solemnize or 
presume to solemnize any marriage between any parties without a license being 
presented to him or them as herein provided or with knowledge that either party is 
legally incompetent to contract matrimony as is provided for in this article he shall 
be guilty of a misdemeanor . . . .â

 

Penal Law sec. 255.00 provides that âA person is guilty of unlawfully solemnizing a 
marriage[, a misdemeanor,] when: 1. Knowing that he is not authorized by the laws of 
this state to do so, he performs a marriage ceremony or presumes to solemnize a 
marriage; or 2. Being authorized by the laws of this state to perform marriage 
ceremonies and to solemnize marriages, he performs a marriage ceremony or solemnizes a 
marriage knowing that a legal impediment to such marriage exists.â

 

Given this is so, wouldnât the minister be guilty simply by performing a religious 
marriage ceremony in which the parties solemnly declare (in front of the clergyman and 
at least one witness) that they take each other as husband and wife?  It seems to me 
that the ministerâs performing the ceremony -- which, I stress again, simply 
involves speaking -- would be a crime whether or not he says âby the authority 
vested in me by the State of New York.â  The statute draws no distinction between 
marriages intended to be purely religious marriages and those intended to have legal 
significance.  Or am I misreading the statutes?

 
Eugene

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Reply via email to