RE: Lesser protection for religious advocacy

[Newsom Michael]

You might.   -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 5:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Lesser protection for religious advocacy   In a message dated 11/9/2004 5:00:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can't the state regulate the use of its property?  Can't one say that failure to do so might amount to state action? Seems at least plausible that if you can make that work, you can find state action in the failure of a local government agency to prevent assaults on public sidewalks.  After all, they are public property.   Jim Henderson Senior Counsel ACLJ

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.