I would not lump the Declaration with the Constitution in terms of God-consciousness.  The two times are radically different. 
 
The Declaration was penned at a time when Americans believed that they were God's chosen for the first successful republican form of government in history.  The optimism was Enlightenment-inspired and as much as hubris as faith. 
 
The Constitution was drafted after they learned they were an utter failure at crafting government the first time around (the Articles).  The Calvinist instinct at the time to distrust all humans kicked in with some force, so the focus was on how to limit and deter the power of those in positions of power--not on how they were ascending to the greatest free government in history.  They no longer believed they were God's only chosen, but rather fallible men who could do no better than to experiment with whatever structures and people  they had at hand.  The horizon was no longer God's horizon, but man's.  The result is a Constitution that focuses on structure and does not engage in God-talk.
 
In either case, it is impossible to argue this is a "Christian" country with any plausibility. It's as much as Christian as it is Enlightenment, Greek, and Roman, theology and philosophy, which is to say it is all of them put together and more.
 
As for Franklin's suggestion regarding prayer, it was not so much politely ignored as no one was willing to pay for the cost of having a cleric come into their deliberations and deliver a prayer...
 
Marci
 
 
 
Had TJ wanted to use words like "the Great God of the Bible" or The Father, Son and Holy Ghost, or The Jehovah, he certainly could have.  The language of the Declaration (and the utter lack of any mention of God in the Constitution) illustrates the general diestic flavor of the founding and the general view of the founding generation to avoid discussion of religion in their political development.  It is not insignifcant, I think that none of the existing records of the federal convention contain any references to God or the Bible (much less the 10 C) and that when Franklin suggesting beginning the sessions with prayer, as a desperate attempt avoid a collapse of the Convention, he was politely ignored.
 
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to