Eugene:  You obviously did not read the first two paragraphs of the post if 
that is all you saw!

Quoting "Volokh, Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

>       Well, all I saw was what the post said.  The post listed bad
> things that Christianity is responsible for; it seemed pretty
> clearly
> like a slam at Christianity.  It strikes me as very likely
> that many
> people would have interpreted it this way.  I would have
> thought that
> the author would have understood that it would be interpreted
> this way.
> I don't see the upside to turning this list into a forum for
> "here's
> what's wrong with your religion -- no, here's what's wrong
> with your
> religion," and I see lots of downside.
> 
>       Eugene
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Paul 
> > Finkelman
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 12:44 PM
> > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> > Subject: Re: From the list custodian
> > 
> > 
> > Eugene:
> > 
> > My point was a serious one about how one organizes a course,
> and 
> > reminder that when people teach a course to argue for a 
> > viewpoint and to 
> > ignore other information it undermines academic integrity. 
> 
> > The fact is 
> > this:  a "History of the Influence of Christianity in 
> > American history" 
> > taught in a fundamentalist Christian school would not likely
> 
> > teach many 
> > of the topics I suggested; most American history coursres 
> > would teach a 
> > number of them, as well as teach about Puritans, the two
> great 
> > awakenings, the role of religious people in the antislavery
> 
> > movement and 
> > the civil rights movement.
> > 
> > If Rick wants to play the list game, I think it only fair to
> 
> > explore the 
> > issue.
> > 
> > Paul Finkelman
> > 
> > Volokh, Eugene wrote:
> > >     Folks:  I'm sure that people on this list would be
> able 
> > to compile
> > > lists of the great sins of atheists and atheistic regimes;
> 
> > of Muslims; 
> > > of Jews; of Catholics; of Protestants; and more.  They 
> > would also be 
> > > able to compile lists of the good things that each of
> those 
> > groups have 
> > > done.  Whether religion (or irreligion) generally, or
> certain 
> > > denominations in particular, are on balance malign or 
> > benign influences 
> > > on the nation is a topic that has been debated for 
> > centuries, and has 
> > > filled volumes.  It can easily fill days and days of list
> 
> > discussion, 
> > > too, should people choose to embark on it.
> > >  
> > >     But do we really think that posting such lists -- no
> matter how 
> > > much
> > > the post may entertain the author -- will be helpful to
> thoughtful, 
> > > reasoned list discussion of the law of government and
> religion?
> > >  
> > >     The list custodian
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >     Paul Finkelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > >         Dear Rick:
> > > 
> > >         I would assume that UC has equivalent courses such
> 
> > as "History of
> > >         Christianity"; "Renaissance/Reformation" and a 
> > number of early
> > >         modern
> > >         European courses and late antiquity courses that
> deal almost
> > >         entirely
> > >         with the Church and Church history. There are 
> > probably courses
> > >         on the
> > >         Bible taught in various departments at UC as they
> 
> > are in most
> > >         universities. Moreover, the history of religion 
> > pops up all over
> > >         the
> > >         place. When I used to teach US Survery in a
> history 
> > department I
> > >         always
> > >         spent at least a week on the Puritans and assigned
> 
> > a book about
> > >         them.
> > >         My discussion of 19th century reform movements 
> > included a good
> > >         deal on
> > >         the 2nd great awakening; I always had a lecture on
> 
> > the 1st great
> > >         awkening in a survey course. Every colonial
> history course I
> > >         ever took
> > >         (or knew of) had a huge section on religion. In
> anything,
> > >         colonialists
> > >         probably spend too much time on the Puritans.
> > > 
> > >         Furthermore, I would imagine that a great number
> of 
> > the courses
> > >         below
> > >         would have content about Christians and 
> > Christianity, including
> > >         "Storytelling," "Gender, Sexuality, and Identity
> in 
> > Literature,"
> > >         (lots
> > >         of interesting religious issues there, from the 
> > problem of guilt to
> > >         fundamentalist hombophobia) "Jewish History," (had
> 
> > to teach it
> > >         without
> > >         discussing Christianity); Turning Points in Jewish
> 
> > History (same
> > >         comment); Issues in African History (from 
> > Missionaries to Bishop
> > >         Tutu it
> > >         will show up); Holocaust Literature, Islam, etc. 
> > will all have to
> > >         discuss Christianity and its relationship to other
> 
> > faiths and
> > >         events.
> > > 
> > >         I think a course on the "Influence of Christianity
> 
> > in the US"
> > >         would be
> > >         interesting and certainly valid. Such a course 
> > would lectures and
> > >         readings on the following (in no particular
> order):
> > > 
> > >         The KKK (and the use of the Cross as a symbol of 
> > terrorism and
> > >         hatred;
> > >         Christian "identity" movements in the last 25
> years
> > >         Father Coughlin's antisemitism
> > >         The hanging of witches in Salem and Quakers in
> Boston
> > >         The use of Christian theology to defend (as well
> as 
> > attack) slavery
> > >         The use of conversion of slaves to help prevent 
> > resistance to
> > >         slavery
> > >         Ownership of slaves by churches
> > >         The utter failure of the Protestant Churches in
> the 
> > South to the
> > >         take a
> > >         strong stand in favor of legalizing slave
> marriages
> > >         The persecution of Mormons and the murder of
> Joseph Smith
> > >         The death penalty (fortunately reduced to exile) 
> > for a Jew in
> > >         colonial
> > >         Maryland because he denied the divinity of Christ
> > >         The whipping and jailing of Baptist ministers in 
> > Virginia in the
> > >         Revolutionary period.
> > >         The intellectual intolerance of the 1920s (and
> more recent
> > >         periods) by
> > >         prohibiting the teaching of evolution in the
> public schools
> > >         The forced reading of Protestant version of the 
> > Bible imposed on
> > >         Catholics in the 19th century
> > >         The a! ttacks on Al Smith's presidential campaign
> (and also
> > >         attack on John
> > >         F. Kennedy) because they were Catholic.
> > >         The strong stand against integration taken by
> virtually ever
> > >         southern
> > >         Christian minister in the 1950s and early 1960s.
> > >         The influence of religious groups in undermining 
> > Indian culture and
> > >         religion and forcing Indian children not to learn
> their own
> > >         language.
> > >         The use of Protestant theology (and the influence
> 
> > of Christian
> > >         leaders)
> > >         to justify wars against Indians, particularly in 
> > the colonial
> > >         period.
> > > 
> > >         Yes, it would be a great course; I would love to
> teach it.
> > > 
> > >         Paul Finkelman
> > >         -- 
> > >         Paul Finkelman
> > >         Chapman Distinguished Professor
> > >         University of Tulsa College of Law
> > >         3120 East 4th Place
> > >         Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104-2499
> > > 
> > >         918-631-3706 (office)
> > >         918-631-2194 (fax)
> > > 
> > >         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > >         Rick Duncan wrote:
> > >          > If you haven't read the complaint
> > >          >
> > >          > in the Association of Christian Schools v. UC
> case, I
> > >         encourage you to
> > >          > do so. Although UC denied approval to courses
> concerning
> > >          > "Christianity's Influence on American History"
> and
> > >         "Christianity and
> > >          > Morality in American Literature" as being too 
> > narrow and not
> > >         consistent
> > >          > "with knowledge generally accepted in the
> collegiate
> > >         community," at the
> > >          > same time it approved courses such as these:
> > >          >
> > >          > Social Commentary in Popular Music
> > >          > Baseball, Literature and Culture
> > >          > Sports Fiction/Non Fiction
> > >          > Storytelling
> > >          > The Roots of Rock Music ("yeah, yeah, yeah")
> > >          > Gender Roles in Literature
> > >          > Ethnic Experience in Literature
> > >          > Gender, Sexuality, and Identity in Literature
> > >          > Literature of the Counterculture
> > >          > Literature from the 60's Movement
> > >          > Filipino Heritage Studies
> > >          > Intro to Rabbinic Literature
> > >          > Jewish History
> > >          > Turning Poi! nts in Jewish History
> > >          > Issues in African History
> > >          > Raza Studies
> > >          > History of India
> > >          > Mexican History
> > >          > Modern Irish History
> > >          > Asian Literature
> > >          > Holocaust Literature
> > >          > Chicano Literature
> > >          > Beat Literature (like, cool, man!)
> > >          > Women's Literature
> > >          > Intro to Buddhism
> > >          > Islam
> > >          >
> > >          > And the beat goes on. There were many similar 
> > courses that were
> > >          > also approved.
> > >          >
> > >          > Now these facts are from the complaint. UC may
> 
> > reply that it
> > >         has not
> > >          > approved Beat Literature or Baseball Literature
> 
> > or the other
> > >          > narrow courses from specialized points of view.
> 
> > But if these
> > >         are the
> > >          > facts. this case looks very much like the kind
> 
> > of religious
> > >         gerrymander
> > >          > we saw in Lukumi where a person could kill an
> animal for
> > >         almost any
> > >          > reason except religious ritual. And it also 
> > looks like the
> > >         kind of
> > >          > subjective, individualized, discretionary
> procedures that
> > >         trigger ! strict
> > >          > scrutiny under Sherbert and the individualized
> 
> > process rule.
> > >          >
> > >          > I have only glanced at the 108-page complaint,
> 
> > but it sure
> > >         looks to me
> > >          > like the Pls have a strong claim of viewpoint 
> > and religious
> > >          > discrimination. Indeed, there seems to be at
> least a
> > >         possibility of
> > >          > denominational discrimination in the approval
> process. It
> > >         would not
> > >          > surprise me at all if UC settles this one as
> quickly and
> > >         quietly as
> > >          > possible.
> > >          >
> > >          > Rick Duncan
> > >          >
> > >          >
> > >          >
> > >          >
> > >          >
> > >          > Rick Duncan
> > >          > Welpton Professor of Law
> > >          > University of Nebraska College of Law
> > >          > Lincoln, NE 68583-0902
> > >          >
> > >          > "When the Round Table is broken every man must
> 
> > follow either
> > >         Galahad or
> > >          > Mordred: middle things are gone." C.S.Lewis, 
> > Grand Miracle
> > >          >
> > >          > "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed,
> briefed,
> > >         debriefed, or
> > >          > numbered." --The Prisoner
> > >          >
> > >          >
> __________________________________________________
> > >          > Do You Yahoo!?
> > >          > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam 
> > protection around
> > >          > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >          >
> > >          >
> > >          >
> > >         
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > >          >
> > >          >
> _______________________________________________
> > >          > To post, send message to
> Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> > >          > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or 
> > get password,
> > >         see 
> > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
> > >          >
> > >          > Please note that messages sent to this large 
> > list cannot be
> > >         viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the
> list and read
> > >         messages that are posted; people can read the Web
> 
> > archives; and
> > >         list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
> 
> > messages to
> > >         others.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >         _______________________________________________
> > >         To post, send message to
> Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> > >         To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get
> 
> > password, see
> > >        
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
> > > 
> > >         Please note that messages sent to this large list
> cannot be
> > >         viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the
> list and read
> > >         messages that are posted; people can read the Web
> 
> > archives; and
> > >         list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
> 
> > messages to
> > >         others.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >     Rick Duncan
> > >     Welpton Professor of Law
> > >     University of Nebraska College of Law
> > >     Lincoln, NE 68583-0902
> > > 
> > >     "When the Round Table is broken every man must follow
> 
> > either Galahad
> > >     or Mordred: middle things are gone." C.S.Lewis, Grand
> Miracle
> > > 
> > >     "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, 
> > briefed, debriefed,
> > >     or numbered." --The Prisoner
> > > 
> > >     
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > >     Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief
> effort.
> > >     <http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get
> password, see 
> > >
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
> > > 
> > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot
> be 
> > viewed as 
> > > private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read 
> > messages that are 
> > > posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members
> can 
> > > (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Paul Finkelman
> > Chapman Distinguished Professor
> > University of Tulsa College of Law
> > 3120 East 4th Place
> > Tulsa, Oklahoma  74104-2499
> > 
> > 918-631-3706 (office)
> > 918-631-2194 (fax)
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password,
> 
> > see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
> > 
> > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be
> 
> > viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and
> read 
> > messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives;
> 
> > and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
> > messages to others.
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password,
> see
> http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
> 
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be
> viewed as private.  Anyone can subscribe to the list and read
> messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives;
> and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages
> to others.
> 



Paul Finkelman
Chapman Distinguished Professor of Law
Univ. of Tulsa College of Law
2120 East 4th Place
Tulsa OK  74104-3189

Phone: 918-631-3706
Fax:    918-631-2194
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to