Just a reminder that this list is designed for discussion of the
law of government and religion, not broader debate about constitutional
law or constitutionalism. Such broader debate may be tremendously
interesting and important -- this list just isn't the place for it.
The list custodian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:07 AM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> Subject: Alito/The Constitution
>
>
> Anyone disturbed that Judge Alito has said: "I don't agree
> with the theory that the Constitution always trumps stare
> decisis"? Sounds like he's broken his Supreme Court Justice
> oath before he's taken it. John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com.
> _______________________________________________
> To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password,
> see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
>
> Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be
> viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read
> messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives;
> and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
> messages to others.
>
_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the
messages to others.
