Application of this law to Catholic Charities should have raised a quite 
plausible claim under the Massachusetts Free Exercise Clause.  See the Society 
of Jesus case about 1990, and a mid-90s case on marital status discrimination 
by landlords, the name of which I am forgetting.  
 
So why did Catholic Charities surrender rather than litigate?  Maybe they 
figured they would just make bad law with that claim in the court that found a 
constitutional right to gay marriage.  If that's the reason, that sort of 
restraint in the choice of what claims to file should be practiced a lot more 
widely.  If that just didn't think about the state law, that's much less 
admirable.
 
 
 
Douglas Laycock
University of Texas Law School
727 E. Dean Keeton St.
Austin, TX  78705
512-232-1341
512-471-6988 (fax)

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Will Esser
Sent: Sat 3/11/2006 12:35 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Catholic Charities Issue


Paul,
 
Your comparison doesn't fit and doesn't reveal any inconsistency on the part of 
the Church.  Catholic Charities withdrew from the adoption arena, because the 
state mandate would require it to actively participate in the actual act with 
which it disagreed (i.e. placing children for adoption with gay couples).  In 
your example, there is no conflict for the Church in ministering to the souls 
of those in the prison system.  Such action is not in any sense active 
participation in capital punishment.  
 
I'm entirely with Rick in saluting Catholic Charities for its decision.  People 
may disagree with the rationale for the decision, but the decision is 
ultimately an act of a religious organization placing its religious values 
first.
 
Will

Paul Finkelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

        I wonder if the Catholic Church should withdraw all support for the 
prison system because the Church opposes Capital punishment?  It would be a 
shame for those on death row not to get last rites, or those in prison not to 
be able to talk to a priest, but at least the Church would be consistent. 
        
        Paul Finkelman
        
        Rick Duncan wrote:
        

                The Boston Globe has two good articles today on the decision by 
the Archdiocese to end its adoption services rather than submit to the 
government's antidiscrimination rules requiring the Church to place children 
with homosexual couples despite its sincerely held religious belief that 
''allowing children to be adopted by persons living in such unions would 
actually mean doing violence to these children, in the sense that their 
condition of dependency would be ! used to place them in an environment that is 
not conducive to their full human development."
                 
                Here 
<http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/03/11/catholic_charities_stuns_state_ends_adoptions/>
  and here 
<http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2006/03/11/churchs_rift_with_beacon_hill_grows/>
 .
                
                


                Rick Duncan 
                Welpton Professor of Law 
                University of Nebraska College of Law 
                Lincoln, NE 68583-0902
                 

                "When the Round Table is broken every man must follow either 
Galahad or Mordred: middle things are gone." C.S.Lewis, Grand Miracle
                
                "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, 
debriefed, or numbered." --The Prisoner
________________________________

                Yahoo! Mail
                Use Photomail 
<http://pa.yahoo.com/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=38867/*http://photomail.mail.yahoo.com>
  to share photos without annoying attachme! nts. 
                
________________________________

                  _______________________________________________  To post, 
send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu  To subscribe, unsubscribe, change 
options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw    Please note that 
messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  Anyone can 
subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the 
Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to 
others.


        --   Paul Finkelman  Chapman Distinguished Professor of Law  University 
of Tulsa College of Law  3120 East 4th Place  Tulsa, OK   74104-3189    
918-631-3706 (office)  918-631-2194 (fax)    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

        _______________________________________________
        To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
        To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw
        
        Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as 
private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; 
people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) 
forward the messages to others.




Will Esser --- Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam
Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein
Charlotte, North Carolina

********************
We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark;
the real tragedy is when men are afraid of the light.
Plato (428-345 B.C.)
********************

<<winmail.dat>>

_______________________________________________
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see 
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw

Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private.  
Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can 
read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the 
messages to others.

Reply via email to