Hi Skipp, Yes I reread the post and realize I jumped to some horrible 
conclusion.  My bad.  Guess I'll sink back into my cave and think 
twice before commenting.  

Randy
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "skipp025" <skipp...@...> 
wrote:
>
> 
> Hi Randy, 
> 
> I did place a notch cavity in the antenna feed line, tuned 
> to the image frequency of the receiver IF.
> 
> As an example 
> 
> Notch 245.750MHz (TV Channel 14 Audio Carrier Frequency) 
> 
> 245.750MHz minus 21.4 IF = 224.05 
> 
> Receiver IF Frequencies vary a bit... and both Channel 
> 13 and 14 analog are quite happy to provide a strong 
> image source. 
> 
> Original Icom 3AT portables are/were really problematic 
> to use in my area because of poor TV signal image rejection. 
> 
> cheers, 
> skipp 
> 
> > "wb8art" <wb8art@> wrote:
> > Skipp, why would you not filter it on the input?
> > Randy
> > 
> > 
> > --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "skipp025" <skipp025@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I remember that Neutec Unit... saw it on Ebay. 
> > > 
> > > Mike
> > > 
> > > Do you have any analog television stations on channel(s) 11 
> > > through 14 in the area still on the air? 
> > > 
> > > If so, I might suspect an IF image might be possible. I had 
> > > the same type of problem here from channel 13 getting into a 
> > > number of Icom receivers. 
> > > 
> > > I had to notch the image frequency of my IF to get rid of 
> > > it. 
> > > 
> > > s. 
> > > 
> > > > "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > My recent efforts at putting a 220 repeater on the air here 
in 
> > western
> > > > Florida have been mildly succesful.  I am using a Neutec 
designed
> > > repeater.
> > > > ( I know there are some uhf and vhf models around, this one 
is on 
> > 220, a
> > > > RANGER brand ).  The repeater is open access. And runs quiet 
all 
> > day or
> > > > night, nothing cracking the squelch at all.  But during times 
when
> > > there is
> > > > a conversation going on after a few minutes a rather nasty 
signal
> > > captures
> > > > the repeater sometimes in short bursts, sometimes much 
longer. 
> > > "Sounds like
> > > > someone talking into a reverb chamber.."  I had been using a 
> > Mirage
> > > brick
> > > > amp in the rack, but suspected that this amp might be the 
> > problem, some
> > > > oscillation or internal mixing of some sort.  This turned out 
not 
> > to
> > > be the
> > > > case, the amp though still in the circuit is OFF but we still 
get 
> > the
> > > > garbage.  When the amp would be ON, and I would sometimes 
hear 
> > this
> > > stuff
> > > > start, and I could turn OFF the amp an it would stop.  But 
> > shortly later
> > > > even with the amp OFF, it is back.very odd that it would 
appear 
> > to me. 
> > > > 
> > > > Now, all cables in the rack are RG-400. Every one in the 
rack.  
> > Half
> > > inch
> > > > hardline runs to the antenna, though there is a splice with a 
> > double
> > > male N
> > > > connector as I recall. The Neutec unit does about 25 watts 
output
> > > but I have
> > > > it cut back to about 10 watts thinking it will run cooler.  
Thus
> > > with the
> > > > small brick amp it was doing about 65 watts output to the 
> > Telewave 4
> > > cavity
> > > > duplexer.  
> > > > 
> > > > While at the site tonight, I could hear something getting 
into the
> > > recvr.
> > > > The repeater was UP, but no one talking at that moment.  
Again,
> > > nothing on
> > > > it's own ever appears to break the squelch. The noise was 
heard
> > > through the
> > > > repeater's on board speaker, meaning it was coming through 
the 
> > antenna /
> > > > recvr and not something produced in the rack I would assume.  
> > > > 
> > > > There is a cel tower about 1,000ft away and another tower 
with ( 
> > who
> > > knows )
> > > > how many other users,  another 500ft further away.  Based on 
this
> > > little bit
> > > > of info what would the masses suggest in first FINDING the 
> > offending
> > > source
> > > > if is indeed intermod?    Then, is there much than can be 
done 
> > short of
> > > > moving my machine?   Any ideas or suggestions?
> > > > 
> > > > n  Mike
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to