Assuming you want only more power that the nuc offers, I would consider piping the rf out of the msf into the nuc pa leaving the msf rx/tx repeat path intact. It would involve matching the rf power levels out/in and the pa control line to the msf pa control functioning. The reverse is what i plan for a quantar cage to msf vhf 350 watt pa (quantro idea). Could be entertaining. . bill w4oo .
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, James Adkins <adkins.ja...@...> wrote: > > Which brings up another interesting question: > > We are already using a 75w MSF-5000. Could a Motorola Nucleus II paging > transmitter be used and the MSF-5000 receiver? We're using an external > controller, S-COM 7330. I don't see why one couldn't just wire up the RX > audio, COR and PL to the RX side and the NUC II to the PTT and TX audio > lines. > > Thoughts? > > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Bill <jawjabill...@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think the Micor rx is a great idea. Unless they came from a 900 micor > > rptr, they probably were used in paging or linking service, making them the > > 5 khz variety, The IF xtals could be changed for the 2.5 khz modulation, but > > no flutter fighter or compandering available like the msf series. And, Mike, > > yes I have contemplated an article that would detail the procedure. The > > first unit I did took about a week out of my life and large fistful of hair. > > The key ingredient to making the spectra play rx on 902 is the software, it > > has to be hacked up so bad that it will not work on any standard or ham > > units. The rx front end is the worst and most time consuming part because of > > it's tuning requirements. And after reading you qrz history, Mike, I plan to > > reincarnate as a butterfly so I may follow you as you enjoy life. > > . > > Bill > > w4oo > > . > > > > --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com<Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>, > > Mike Morris WA6ILQ <wa6ilq@> wrote: > > > > > > At 10:22 AM 11/22/09, you wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > >Been there done that seven years ago...it is a liiittle more than > > > >the three items listed that need to be done........ > > > >For the NUC RX idea, I have been thinking about doing a rx for that > > > >purpose, however, my concern is, will all that work have pay dirt... > > > >If some one can show the 902 rx front end is truly usable in high rf > > > >environment, I will work with them to...git-er-done... > > > > > > What's wrong with a Moto Aux Receiver (a Micor) on 900? > > > They exist, work REAL well, have independent COR (channel busy) and > > > PL decode lines, etc. > > > The Aux Receiver chassis has the receiver board vertical, the MSF > > > Link Receiver chassis has > > > it horizontal to take up less rack space. > > > > > > >I currently have two 900 spectras in a sales catalog bag with wide > > > >duplexer and controller to operate on any one of the eighty channels > > > >902-903 and 927-928. All that's needed is twelve volts and antenna. > > > > > > Want to do an article on it? > > > > > > Mike WA6ILQ > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > James Adkins, KB0NHX > Vice-President -- Nixa Amateur Radio Club, Inc. (KC0LUN) > > Southern Missouri Frequency Coordinator - Missouri Repeater Council > www.nixahams.net > > The Nixa Amateur Radio Club - "There is no charge for awesomeness!" (Well, > only $1.00 per month) >