On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Joshua Daniel Franklin <jdf.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> I basically put the couple of days after a release to be 'dead' space >> and if its important enough for my 'customers' not to have that >> problem I budget in a satellite. Sometimes they will do it.. and >> sometimes they won't. > > I can see both sides of this. Of course as a customer I would like to > get the ISOs before the GA. . . because that would be faster. However, > Red Hat could get the reputation of being a secretive cabal doing > things in a non-public way, which shareholders especially hate when > they think a new product might have a couple extra days of sales. By > the way, I don't know if the satellite management is manual, but 5.3 > is not on our satellite yet.
It can be either manual or sudo automated (I think). -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice" _______________________________________________ rhelv5-list mailing list rhelv5-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv5-list
