On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:59:27 +0200 Sven Söhnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If for some reason it *must* be an attachment - 'mutt' will send >> files as attachments and handle encoding properly etc from a >> commandline, but inline would certainly be cleaner and easier... >> >> Brian > >Inline is the better way of course. >But: How could I implement this? >Any suggestions?
Not a "real" rkhunter-users question so please let's not make it a habit, there's other lists for that... That said, you could use "mpack" for scripting emails with stuff attached. Cheers, unSpawn ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Rkhunter-users mailing list Rkhunter-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rkhunter-users
