On Wednesday 17 November 2004 05:40 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 November 2004 23:32, Silvan wrote:
> > On Monday 15 November 2004 01:44 pm, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > > Yes, I foolishly introduced a performance problem mere hours before the
> > > 0.9.91 build.  It's fixed in CVS now, and will be fixed in the next
> > > build.
> >
> > How do branches work?  Do I have to go build HEAD to see this?
>
> Yes, or the test tarball I've just uploaded on my homepage.

I guess I should do two trees then.  I'm working on event filter stuff in the 
test tree, so I don't want to de-branch it or whatever.  (I barely know what 
I'm doing with CVS.  Sorry.)

You might like to know that I'm very seriously looking at dumping my entire 
concept for the event filter and going with what you were yelling about two 
years ago; doing a KMail-like series of flexible combos.  I'm thinking about 
it.  When I get done with all the new stuff, there are going to be oodles of 
options to choose from, and I need a good way to organize it.  It's going to 
kick ass once I get it all working.  If I do say so myself.  I think it will 
become one of Rosegarden's most powerful editing features if I can work the 
kinks out of some of my trickier ideas.  Should help make short work of 
cleaning up little goofs in notation rendering by hand.

-- 
Michael McIntyre  ----   Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux fanatic, and certified Geek;  registered Linux user #243621
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/
http://rosegarden.sourceforge.net/tutorial/


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to