> Having said that -- is this really the case? Looking at the last
> version before your changes, it looks as if initialise() was only
> called from the GenericChord (i.e. derived class) ctor, not from
> AbstractSet (base class) ctor. And GenericChord is not a base class
> of anything, things like Chord are just template specialisations of
> it.
A specialisation of GenericChord was (still is) used as the base of
NotationChord. Which isn't obvious, I agree. I didn't see it until I
grepped "GenericChord" through the whole src tree.
Thanks for the comments. I appreciate the second pair of eyes.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
