Hi, I'm in the process of packaging rosegarden 11.11.42 for Redhat EL6 and clones (Centos 6, Scientific Linux 6) but whilst doing so I have been looking at how other distros did it and found a major discrepancy among them.
Basically some distros have only included the files generated by 'make install' in the package, which is the main binary, the desktop file, the desktop icons, the mime file and the fonts while other distros in addition also include most of the subdirectories (and their content) that are located under /data in the source tree. So my questions is, should I include all those sub-dirs under /data and install them in /usr/share/rosegarden (as in: /usr/share/rosegarden/autoload, /usr/share/rosegarden/chords, /usr/share/rosegarden/examples, and so on)? I found that OpenSuse, Mandriva, Mageia include those sub-dirs, while Debian, Ubuntu and Fedora don't include them. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
