On Friday, May 11, 2012, Chris Cannam wrote: > (Tom and Ted) have referred to using git, while the main manager > (Michael) is more comfortable with Subversion.
It's really dead simple for me. I couldn't possibly care less about learning some new version control scheme, and I'm simply not going to deal with it. If Rosegarden changes version control, then that's it for me. I don't think this fact necessarily means Rosegarden shouldn't think about doing it anyway. I'm not blind, and it's patently obvious that git is the fashionable version control scheme these days. I find I'm not strongly invested either way. Vote me in, I'll keep the albatross chained around my neck awhile longer, vote me out by converting the thing I'm supposed to be watching over into an unfamiliar and alien landscape, and I'm sure I'll find stuff to do with all the new spare time. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
