> For what it's worth, I think it's evident that the test framework > Rosegarden "should" be using is the Qt one. (As least, if it's any > good -- which it is; it's pretty nice.) > > > Chris >
*raises hand* yes I'm potentially interested in looking at stuff around testing. I'll need to bone up on the Qt test stuff though, never having used it before. I'm much more interested in the macro top level testing I was talking about earlier (scripting out composition building by capturing the commands issued) rather than the gnarly micro unit testing of writing tests inside every single class and function in RG. I exaggerate there of course, but hopefully you catch my drift! Cheers, Ian. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
