On 09/06/2012 01:54 AM, Richard Bown wrote: > Chris is probably thinking this but I'll say it (after using it a bit now) > but Mercurial/Git would probably make this kind of thing i.e.long > branches/local commits/potential merge somewhat easier.
I think the handful of people who are currently doing real work on Rosegarden these days would probably be fine with the switch to git, as they're all wrestling with some irritating git-svn bridge thing anyway. If you guys decide to go that route, I'm completely fine with that, but I won't be staying on in any kind of development or management role after the switch. That would be the end for me, and I'd probably be pretty content to use that excellent opportunity to exit stage left, to be perfectly honest about it. The truth is I do have some talent for this kind of thing, but it's not what I'm best at, and never will be. Ten years of suffering along with my own mediocrity seems like just about enough, and I was already thinking about making this official come December. It really does seem like an excellent opportunity to change over to distributed version control. Assuming Chris is amenable. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
