On 09/17/2012 03:19 AM, Richard Bown wrote: > On 17 Sep 2012, at 03:11, "D. Michael McIntyre" > <[email protected]> wrote:
> Looks like SF does mercurial right as well? Would be happy to dump it all in > a mercurial subproject - that would make more sense than bit bucket. Only put > it there because I'm mucking about with mercurial and that was the first > place Chris told me about. See, it's all Chris' fault! Sure does. I set up the hg repo, ready for you to dump your goodies in it. https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/windows/code/ref/default~/ You've got your own tickets and your own code repo, but it's still under the same umbrella. I'm pretty sure there's going to be a way to sort all of this out where the Windows fork is off on its own, but not excluded from the official Rosegarden family. I think it looks rather promising really, but I'm not trying to influence you in any way. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
