On 08/07/2014 02:24 PM, Ted Felix wrote: > extreme.) It would be nice to have an RG_ERROR that acts like RG_DEBUG, > but isn't affected by RG_NO_DEBUG_PRINT.
Seems like a fine idea to me. Our use of RG_DEBUG/std::cerr/std::cout has always been incredibly messy and inconsistent for a variety of reasons, which mostly amount to me being lazy and in a hurry. > I didn't notice anything like > that in Debug.h. (Qt has qDebug() and qWarning() which I think roughly > correspond to what I would use.) If only Rosegarden had started life as a pure Qt project from the beginning.... Oh well, not offering anything of real substance here, just fogging a mirror with my nose to demonstrate that I'm not dead. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Infragistics Professional Build stunning WinForms apps today! Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
