On 15 Nov 2015, at 14:10, David Faure <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> No, that was uic ;)

Ah, another TLA.

>> I’m quite interested in this cmake change especially if does make 
>> qmake/qtcreator easier to support out of the box for the existing build. 
> 
> Yes, for qtcreator.
> (no, for qmake - but you don't need qmake when you have the much more 
> powerful cmake).

Ok great.

> Ah! Interesting, I was wondering about portability (which is definitely an 
> argument in favour
> of cmake compared to autoconf), but looking at the code I thought Windows 
> wasn't even a target.
> Good to know that it is.

It’s currently in a separate repo on github but perhaps once these changes have 
stabilised I’ll have a look at merging them back in a bit more permanently.  
I’m also interested in a potential Mac port too.  The windows one is based 
around RtMidi but the MIDI support is very basic and no audio support at all.  
If we’re building all platforms out of a single codebase is should make it a 
bit easier to put some consistent effort into properly cross platform MIDI and 
Audio solution.  This depends of course where things are right now - JACK is of 
course cross platform anyway but last I knew it was only handling audio for RG 
and not MIDI as well.  If both went through JACK it would make cross platform a 
lot simpler and indeed might be the best way forward.

R
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to