On 04/26/2016 10:05 AM, Ted Felix wrote: > Probably not. In fact, I just tested it with a sequence with two > synths, and the second one doesn't work in this situation. So, this is > a feature/bug.
It seems to me "no sequencer" implies "there may be a studio for file loading purposes, but none of the connections to anything are hooked up, because there is no backend, and no sound will be produced." Seems like the proper solution would be to leave the noise playing code, and if that code worked correctly, it wouldn't play any noise when --no-sequencer. Seems like the caller shouldn't have to worry about this, and the sequencer should deal with disabling itself. I don't have a strong sense of what is right and good with this one. The most useful thing it could be used for is running Rosegarden as a GUI only on BSD or OS-X or something. People used to do that. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
