På Tirsdag 15 april 2008 , 18:30:31 skrev Jeff Johnson:
> On Apr 15, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> > På Tirsdag 15 april 2008 , 18:02:05 skrev Jeff Johnson:
> >> On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
> >>> Anyways, I tried rebuilding it with rpm 5.1.0, same happens.
> >>
> >> Unsorted dependencies may be just one of several flaws.
> >>
> >> Did you try reproducing with the patch I posted? The patch
> >> should verify whether my hypothesis that the index into the
> >> dependency
> >> set is the fundamental flaw.
> >
> > Yupp, it gives the same assertion error.
>
> Does it say assertion failed or does it just segfault? The assertion
> failure is different than the segfault. There is no "same".
I noticed just now that my previous mail about this didn't make it to the list
since I sent it from the wrong address. This is what happens:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpms]# LC_ALL=C
rpm -Uvh
/home/peroyvind/RPM/RPMS/x86_64/drakxtools-curses-10.29-1mdv2008.1.x86_64.rpm
/home/peroyvind/RPM/RPMS/noarch/drakx-net-*
error: Failed dependencies:
drakxtools-backend = 10.29-1mdv2008.1 is needed by
drakxtools-curses-10.29-1mdv2008.1.x86_64
libdrakx-net = 0.34 is needed by drakx-net-0.34-1mdv2008.1.noarch
libdrakx-net = 0.34 is needed by drakx-net-text-0.34-1mdv2008.1.noarch
drakxtools-curses = 10.22-1mdv2008.1 is needed by (installed)
harddrake-10.22-1mdv2008.1.x86_64
drakxtools-curses = 10.22-1mdv2008.1 is needed by (installed)
drakxtools-10.22-1mdv2008.1.x86_64
rpm: depends.c:1776: zapRelation: Assertion `tsi->tsi_reqx >= 0 &&
tsi->tsi_reqx < rpmdsCount(requires)' failed.
Avbrutt (SIGABRT)
>
> >> Also try reproducing with --noparentdirs ...
> >
> > I have parent dir deps disabled by default.
>
> Which is not rpm-5.1.0 either.
?
--
Regards,
Per Øyvind Karlsen
______________________________________________________________________
RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org
Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org
