2008/12/5 Per Øyvind Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > While I've commited most of the mandriva patches upstream, I still got a > few > ones left that I've been uncertain about and hasn't bothered with looking > at yet: > > > http://www.zarb.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/snapshot/rpm/current/SOURCES/rpm-4.4.1-fileconflicts.patch?root=rpm5distro&view=log > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151609) > > > http://www.zarb.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/snapshot/rpm/current/SOURCES/rpm-4.4.4-rpmqv-ghost.patch?root=rpm5distro&view=log > (https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=19392) > > Reading bugzilla entries, both suggests that these issues has been fixed > upstream already, is this the case? Is there no longer any sense to these > patches? > > I'd like to get rid of these, then I'd be down to only three local patches > left. :o) > > (Feel free to comment on the other ones while you're at it;) > -- > Regards, > Per Øyvind
Here I got one that I'm not sure if I understand: http://www.zarb.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/snapshot/rpm/current/SOURCES/rpm-build-expand-field-for-single-token.patch?root=rpm5distro&view=log The comment I find in spec about it is the following: # rpm now check there is only one token per field # too bad, the check is performed before macro expansion... Oh, and I also got this one: http://www.zarb.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/snapshot/rpm/current/SOURCES/rpm-4.4.8-raise-read-timeout-to-60secs.patch?root=rpm5distro&view=log Any suggestions on what would be the best approach? Just use #ifdef vendor? It seems to me that this might be useful also for others that are performing the same task with the possibility of very high load.. I dunno, but it's the last local patch left, would be nice to get rid of it to satisfy my neatfreak urges. ;) -- Regards, Per Øyvind
