On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 02:56:20PM -0400, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> > I should point out that writing the attached
> > message (and sending from the wrong e-mail address) has instantly
> > led to a different -- and perhaps more natural -- syntax like
> >
> > Requires: set(libfoo.so.1) >= whatever
> >
>
> After a month of quietly muddling, I like this namespace like syntax
> better because it doesn't lead to magic tokens like "set:" in the EVR
> string and is more consistent with existing namespaces in RPM dependencies.
Is that just syntax? I.e., will rpm -q --whatprovides libfoo.so.1
still find the package?
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder m...@suse.de
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
______________________________________________________________________
RPM Package Manager http://rpm5.org
Developer Communication List rpm-devel@rpm5.org
