> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Jeffrey Johnson <n3...@me.com>
> Subject: Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot
> Date: March 15, 2016 at 6:36:06 PM EDT
> To: "PLD: Developers list (English)" <pld-devel...@lists.pld-linux.org>
> Reply-To: "PLD: Developers list (English)" <pld-devel...@lists.pld-linux.org>
>
>>
>> On Mar 15, 2016, at 6:14 PM, Elan Ruusamäe <g...@pld-linux.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 15.03.2016 22:27, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>>> There is a snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
>>>
>>>
>>> http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160315.src.rpm
>> it's text fields seem to contain garbage:
>>
>> [~/rpm/packages/rpm(5.4.15) (dev-5.4.16)⚡] ➔ less
>> rpm-5.4.16-0.20160315.src.rpm
>> Name : rpm Relocations: (not relocatable)
>> Version : 5.4.16 Vendor: (none)
>> Release : 0.20160315 Build Date: T 15 märts 2016
>> 21:13:03 EET
>> Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: hi.jbj.org
>> Group : (<C2>^E^B Source RPM: (none)
>> Size : 20861253 License: LGPLv2
>> Signature : RSA/SHA1, T 15 märts 2016 21:13:03 EET, Key ID fd73f8a36edb4910
>> URL : http://rpm5.org
>> Summary : <88><EB>^F^B
>> Architecture: x86_64
>> Description :
>> <C8><EB>^F^B
>> * K märts 16 2016 Jeff Johnson <j...@rpm5.org> -5.4.16
>> - improve uncoupling from rpmbuild configuration.
>>
>
> Ah thanks for reporting.
>
> The issue is related to eliminating RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE, there is likely
> a rpmbuild issue … easy fixing todo++. I seem to recall fixing this problem
> before ...
>
>>
>> anyway, will push soon dev-5.4.16 branch in pld repo [1] for anyone wishing
>> to test it
>>
>> ps: tarball size increased 5mb:
>>
>> [~/rpm/packages/rpm(5.4.16) (dev-5.4.16)⚡] ➔ l rpm-5.4.*gz
>> -rw-r----- 1 glen users 15M 25. okt 2014 rpm-5.4.15.tar.gz
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 glen users 20M 15. märts 21:04 rpm-5.4.16.tar.gz
>>
>
> Well the rpm tarsal is likely carrying internal versions of
> BeeCrypt
> PCRE
> POPT
> NEON
> LUA (and several modules)
> libgit2
> Perl-URPMI
> and
> libtpm
> for portability.
>
> Open up the tarsal and rip out what you don’t want (e.g. “rm -rf libtpm
> libgit2”)
> and configure/build against external libraries instead.
>
> Pleas note that my maximally configured development version of rpm looks like
> this:
> $ ldd .libs/rpm | wc -l
> 102
> (Yes that is rpm linking 102 libraries so I include essential components
> internally)
>
> The only lossage will be with LUA: the RPM+LUA embedding will lack some useful
> embedded modules.
>
> This e-mail might be useful too:
> [OM Cooker] rpm-5.4.16 snapshot
> <http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-March/000645.html
>
> <http://ml.openmandriva.org/pipermail/om-cooker_ml.openmandriva.org/2016-March/000645.html>>
>
> hth
>
> 73 de Jeff
>
>>
>> [1] http://git.pld-linux.org/packages/rpm.git
>> <http://git.pld-linux.org/packages/rpm.git> &
>> https://github.com/pld-linux/rpm <https://github.com/pld-linux/rpm>
>>
>> --
>> glen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pld-devel-en mailing list
>> pld-devel...@lists.pld-linux.org <mailto:pld-devel...@lists.pld-linux.org>
>> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
>> <http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pld-devel-en mailing list
> pld-devel...@lists.pld-linux.org <mailto:pld-devel...@lists.pld-linux.org>
> http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en
> <http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en>
