On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 16:40 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Indeed. The thing here is that if you limit the rollback scope to just > config files, things suddenly become far more manageable. It wouldn't cost > an arm and a leg to (optionally) store the entire config file history > separately, say, in a real SCM or something resembling one. > > Imagine being able to diff the config files between this and the previous > (or a year ago) version, or what's currently on the system vs what the > package contained when originally installed. Etc. > > I'd guess that quite a few sysadmins would just love that...
While that's true and it might be nice for rpm to call out to something when it installed a package, I'm pretty sure you don't want "config. rollback" inside rpm. -- James Antill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fedora _______________________________________________ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
