NAK, there are people actually relying on %ghost sizes being recorded and taken 
into account on free disk space checking. That said, in MOST cases the %ghost 
size is simply fubar and we'd be better off not recording it. I could imagine 
something like %ghost(size=1234K) but even that is breaking backwards 
compatibility.

For directories, simply setting size to zero in packages would probably be the 
least wrong value - the size of directory is an implementation detail of the 
installation-time target filesystem and build-time doesn't have a clue. And 
many of the directories that rpm deals with already exist on the fs, but again 
the build-time doesn't have a clue.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/229#issuecomment-306451864
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to