I would've thought closure of #25 and #96 made it fairly clear that it's the
functionality that is not wanted. The problem here isn't so much with the
implementation but the fact that we *don't want to* enable arbitrary embedded
language support in specs and macros. Lua is *the* embedded language of rpm,
end of story.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/190#issuecomment-368513569
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
