Still haven't gotten around to look this in any real detail, but here's another
thought: why limit this to only buildrequires? One of the major shortcomings of
the "new" dependency generator is the inability to generate package specific
dependencies easily, and this looks like a nice general approach to that. So
perhaps this should be %generate with an argument to specify which kind of
dependencies are being generated (buildrequires, requires, provides...).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/593#issuecomment-437358795
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
