Hi, and thanks for your interest!
I thinkt there's some terminology confusion here: the rpm source code is in
this GH repository. We'd certainly want it archived too.
The material in the second link is known as "RPM spec files", which are
essentially build recipes for other software packages. It does seem like a good
idea to archive that kind of material as well, but the rpm upstream doesn't
"own" that material in any sense of the word. So it might be better to ask for
input in the communities whose spec files are being collected: Fedora and
CentOS.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2694#discussioncomment-7207521
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2694/comments/7207...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
