> Please explain how this is all supposed to be integrated by a distro…
I did just that in this fedora-devel post from June:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NEFOV236FJYS2RED2SEOV5YHDFLDX7DK/
It doesn't talk anything about shadow-utils and such dependencies because for
all practical purposes *there are none*. You just don't need to care.
> I understand the decision to move away from systemd-sysusers as the
> implementation, but it would be great if it was still allowed as an option.
Just point `%__systemd_sysusers` to the binary/script that will handle it. The
implementation is entirely selectable, and systemd-sysusers is *the* interface
that it actually follows.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2697#issuecomment-1750560148
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2697/1750560...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
