Thanks! Meanwhile, I did a build of RPM in an Ubuntu 22.04 LTS container and 
got the exact same package as you, the diff follows:

```diff
diff --git a/fedora.xml b/ubuntu.xml
index c4f4df7..6546d2e 100644
--- a/fedora.xml
+++ b/ubuntu.xml
@@ -6,14 +6,14 @@
        <integer>5925</integer>
   </rpmTag>
   <rpmTag name="Sigmd5">
-       <base64>iNEDdobtP19rZ2GLAsxH7w==
+       <base64>mNM0PRkFKXQ5LtOJ4SH0+A==
 </base64>
   </rpmTag>
   <rpmTag name="Sha1header">
-       <string>a42c611d67870c1937623f0da2631eabdf33e948</string>
+       <string>8036a9b66aa7781e4000a441e695bb076acfc450</string>
   </rpmTag>
   <rpmTag name="Sha256header">
-       
<string>eb512d3d8c282d0249701032591c53ffb5904c54c95de04783028387b224d8fe</string>
+       
<string>94d13620f7058c14f24605c1461a9ef89b5b50b80c421a0a0eb7f0c62fe0f638</string>
   </rpmTag>
   <rpmTag name="Name">
        <string>attrtest</string>
@@ -502,12 +502,12 @@
        <string>utf-8</string>
   </rpmTag>
   <rpmTag name="Payloaddigest">
-       
<string>116ce41ebb72f1877cda3d7dedaf5b78770e202d6389ade4e415d78548d703a8</string>
+       
<string>91438332ac8fe92e4d4fcd45edb64b659323b893d9496a339f8587d19d00531a</string>
   </rpmTag>
   <rpmTag name="Payloaddigestalgo">
        <integer>8</integer>
   </rpmTag>
   <rpmTag name="Payloaddigestalt">
-       
<string>116ce41ebb72f1877cda3d7dedaf5b78770e202d6389ade4e415d78548d703a8</string>
+       
<string>91438332ac8fe92e4d4fcd45edb64b659323b893d9496a339f8587d19d00531a</string>
   </rpmTag>
 </rpmHeader>
```

So apparently the checksums are affected by the running OS, although all the 
other tags are equivalent.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2874#issuecomment-1909915279
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2874/1909915...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to