> proper multiarch dependencies (instead of ()(64bit) markers)
As a reminder, I took a stab at this in #360 and later #1038. The big change
since then is the introduction of subarches for both ARM and x86_64, and I
still expect that to happen for RISC-V too. What are we thinking for this now?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2919#discussioncomment-8529506
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2919/comments/8529...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
