> lockfileType - that distinguishes between rpms.in.yaml and rpms.lock.yaml)
I think this field is largely irrelevant since `rpms.in.yaml` is definitely
completely out of scope for this discussion (as this is just the basis for the
actual `rpms.lock.yaml`) as well as because it doesn't really do any job
distinguishing anything, IMO you either have a full lockfile or you don't and
in case of `rpms.in.yaml` it's just a template it's not even a lockfile per-se
and you need a dedicated tool to understand specifically and only this type of
description file to be able to get the final `rpms.lock.yaml`. So, let's not
get ourselves concerned about the former here at all.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2908#discussioncomment-8547878
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2908/comments/8547...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
