> It's arguably package metadata and doesn't belong in the filelist at all if
> possible IMO
Generally, I agree, but I'm operating on the principal that elfdeps shouldn't
access the RPM DB during the build.
(And if we did access the DB for metadata, I'm not sure how we'd allow
packagers to override the version. Would we need to introduce a new field?)
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2372#issuecomment-2010538686
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2372/c2010538...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
