Indeed it should be :) Tnx.
Bas On 27-Jul-2012, at 2:42 PM, Srushti Ambekallu wrote: > On 27-Jul-2012, at 11:34 AM, Bas Vodde wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> How about: >> >> Message.should_receive(:Message.method_a).with(xxx).and_return(true) > > I think that ought to be: > Message.should_receive(:method_a).with(xxx).and_return(true) > >> >> Bas >> >> On 27-Jul-2012, at 1:31 PM, bill gate wrote: >> >>> Hi, I have two model: Message, User >>> >>> message.rb >>> ``` >>> class Message < ActiveRecord::Base >>> class << self >>> def method_a(args) >>> [1,2] >>> end >>> end >>> end >>> ``` >>> >>> user.rb >>> ``` >>> class User < ActiveRecord::Base >>> def method_user >>> if Message.method_a('anythings') >>> #... some code >>> end >>> end >>> end >>> ``` >>> I want to test method_user,but I don't want to test Message#method_a >>> How I can mock Message with method_a? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -- >>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rspec-users mailing list >>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > I think the thing people don't usually realise is classes in Ruby are also > objects in their own right. So, whatever you can do to any other object, you > can do to a class. > > Thanks, > Srushti > http://c42.in > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users