On Tue 25 Oct 2016, devz...@web.de wrote: > > is there a reason why error code 255 is not mentioned in the manpage > and wouldn`t it make sense to add "255 Unexplained Error" there > for completeness ?
It wouldn't be unexplained then anymore, would it? :-) Paul -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
