On 8/18/22 09:38, Khem Raj wrote:
I think the autoconf patch should be good on its own merits regardless
It partly depends on how much we care about compatibility. Putting the 'void' in there will break pre-C89 compilers, as well as C++ compilers pretending (badly) to be C compilers. I doubt whether we care about the former any more, but the latter might be an issue.
there were few other package builds which started to succeed after this change in autoconf
Which ones, exactly, and why? -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
