On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 20:50 -0500, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > - Decide on a standard AST structure to be built out of this? (for > example, JRuby's AST is starting to differ from Ruby's, so even if we > port ParseTree we'll have compatibility issues...so perhaps we > grammarians can also devise a common AST structure that all impls could > be confident would work across impls)
That sounds like a reasonable idea. We will also want that for the formal specification. Hopefully official Ruby will not have a tree-walking interpreter for much longer, and they could theoretically unify too. -mental
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Rubygrammar-grammarians mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygrammar-grammarians
