On Oct 27, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Terence Parr wrote: > > On Oct 27, 2006, at 2:27 PM, MenTaLguY wrote: > >> On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 13:36 -0500, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: >>> Is anyone opposed to having replies go straight to the mailing >>> list? I >>> really hate having one list out of my whole set of subscriptions >>> that >>> requires doing "reply all" rather than just "reply". >> >> I'm in the other boat, actually. Most of the lists I'm on give you a >> choice between replying to the sender and replying to the list. >> >> I guess I don't feel that strongly about it, but I do find it >> frustrating sometimes if "reply to sender" doesn't work. > > Yeah, we went back and forth on this for antlr-interest. It's > annoying as hell, but anything else causes mail loops due to bounced > mail and vacation mail...really much worse. No good solution :(
I suspect it is a function of size. We have 150ish on our seattle.rb mailing list and it isn't a problem. _______________________________________________ Rubygrammar-grammarians mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rubygrammar-grammarians
