Hi Jean-Marc, cc'ed to drools-resarch. Don't know where we want to lead this discussion...
Jean-Marc Vanel wrote: > As some of you know, I'm using Drools as an engine for N3 logic > (http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/Rules) . > So in summary, N3 is a user-friendly language allowing to express facts, > class and properties, and rules. Nice to see some more work on integrating drools with the semantic web side. As I have worked on a related topic recently: - Do I understand you correctly, that you use Drools as rule engine for rules + data where rules + data are defined in OWL? - What standard are your rules based on? - How capable is the OWL rules standard compared to Drools? What do you think? - What do you think about SPIN (http://spinrdf.org/)? - Imho, the drools rule formulation are more user friendly and easier to developed. Have you thought about running your data against native drools rules (e. g. mvel dialect?) cu, Michael _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
