Ian, Why would '2100-100' fail by adding WHITE, MARY? Is it because you would have an extra (i.e. 3 ) in the list? Is this the test that you are trying to evaluate?
Thanks Shannon 2009/5/14 Ian Spence <[email protected]> > Hello all, > > I am new to Drools… > > > > I have a scenario > > > > Each fact object will have the structure: > > > > Title > > Proprietor Group > > Proprietor Name > > > > E.g. > > 2100-100 > > J2 ½ share > > SMITH, JOHN > > JONES, FRED > > T ½ share > > BROWN, CHARLIE > > 2100-101 > > J2 ½ share > > BROWN, CHARLIE > > JONES, FRED > > T ½ share > > SMITH, JOHN > > 2100-102 > > T ½ share > > BROWN, CHARLIE > > J2 ½ share > > JONES, FRED > > SMITH, JOHN > > > > The group names and the proprietor names must be the same across each > Title. The scenario above is a valid case. A failed case would result for > Title 2100-100 if we add an extra Proprietor name e.g. WHITE, MARY. > > > > I anticipate having one rule to cater for this. I am hedging towards the > ‘collect’ operator but cannot get a clear picture on how to implement it. > > > -- > Regards, > Ian Spence > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
