Please don’t reply to existing posts, to start new discussions, it screws up the threads. Please read: http://www.jboss.org/drools/lists Anti-patterns to be ignored or attract abuse from others: 12. Reply to an existing thread but starting a new topic
Mark On 16 Jan 2014, at 03:40, Dean Whisnant <d...@basys.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This may be a very basic question, but I'm using drools 5.1.1 and when I > invoke a stateful session and that session ends I receive back all of the > facts that were created during that session and I translate those into an EDI > transaction. As an example I might have a few objects of types > "2700*LX,2750* N1,2750* REF, and 2750*DTP". I know my rules fired create > objects like: > > LX*1 > N1*75*CMSEC > REF*17*A > DTP*007*D8*20140114 > LX*2 > N1*75*STATUS > REF*17*AFTNM > DTP*007*D8*20140114 > > Each of these lines is an object of the type I mentioned above. > > My task is to make sure that the different object types "stick" together when > I put them in the .x12 file so that they are formatted above. > > What I do internally is I keep track that I have two of each of these > objects, but I don't know if there is some type of timestamp that is on them > that I could keep the first LX, N1, REF, DTP together or not. > > In one example I have a rule that inserts them in the order you see, yes, it > literally inserts 8 objects/facts into memory. And I need to know the order > they were inserted so that I can properly form a file out of them on the > backend. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks, > > Dean > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
