On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Oleg Eterevsky <o...@eterevsky.com> wrote: > I can see the advantages of this solution. The only thing I don't see > is how to pass any meaningful state with an error.
Not sure if you know this, but you can pass any object to the single-argument version of fail!: http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/macros/macro.fail!.html _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
