----- Original Message -----
From: Gavin Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no>
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2000 12:53 AM
Subject: Re: making the SAM spectrum 128 compatible


> >I think I've come up with a fairly practical method of
> >making it possible to run speccy 128 programs on the SAM...
> >it involves a plug-in box which has a 32K ram, a z80, and
> >a certain amount of logic (and perhaps a sound chip). The
> >question is - is there any point pursuing it? It wouldn't
> >be compatible with the +2a/+3.
>
> When you say any point in pursuing it, do you mean to sell it? If so,
> then I doubt there is any point, to be entirely honest with you -
> unless it was very cheap. As a project for anyone to build, then yes,
> I can certainly see a lot of interest in it.

I cant

It's a great idea - in principle - but there are quite a numbner of
potential probs in doing it.

If you can do it, and I believe you have a good chance of getting something
working, then it's going to be quite a clever piece of work indeed....

However, Its probably more easier to hack any unconverted Spectrum 128
titles to work on SAM!


> >
> >Why do more spectrum owners not use the SAM? is it because
> >of it not being 128 compatible, or is it because they can't
> >use their existing spectrum hardware?
> >
> >Andy
>
> As Robert said, probably a lack of availability would be the main
> factor. If only we could get a hold of a pile of SAMs to flog cheaply
> - anyone fancy breaking into Blobby's house? :) We know where he
> lives after all! Mowahahaha!

Well, I was bidding for the SAM Mentioned a couple of days ago to work on
some mods... but some bast's outbidded me.... so sod it :(

Reply via email to