Luke Howard wrote: > > The fact that "sn" is required is a constant annoyance. :-) It's > good to use person or a subclass thereof for compatibility with white > pages-type clients (e-mail address books, etc). The Active Directory > "User" object class is also derived from person. > > Here however, it is perhaps better that the user of "person" as a > structural object class is best left to administrators. SAMBA can > just add the sambaAccount auxiliary object class to such entries. > > In the case where there is no existing entry, then SAMBA should > probably use the "account" structural object class which only > requires the "uid" attribute. See section 5.3 of RFC 2307.
thanks a lot, this (the account object when no pevious entry is present) may simplify the things. Ignacio -- ____________________________________________________ Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CTI, Director fax: 948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/